Can Any Test Measure College Graduates Learning?

November 11th, 2013

By Dr. Watson Scott Swail, President & CEO, Educational Policy Institute

Last month, Time Magazine and Minnesota Public Radio both interviewed me about the use of the Collegiate Learning Assessment PLUS (CLA+) as a measure of “workforce readiness.” For the uninitiated, the CLA+ is a reuse of the “College Learning Assessment,” created by Rand Corporation with support of several large philanthropies back in the 2000s. I wrote about the CLA in the Swail Letter back on November 18, 2011.

In short, I have never agreed with the premise that a singular test could truly measure what a student—any student—learned while in college. It’s like that Robert Fulghum poem that many of us have had on our walls at one time: “All I Needed to Know I Learned in Kindergarten.” How an organization, let alone a school of researchers, could wither four years of liberal arts, scientific, or other four-year postsecondary education into a number is a little beyond me. It’s one thing to use the SAT or ACT to give an indicator of college readiness (and we know that the correlation is still limited past the first year of college), but something completely else to try and do the same thing to gauge what a student learns in 1,800-plus hours of holistic instruction.

Now the Council for Aid to Education (CAE), the mothership for the CLA+, wants to expand the CLA empire and start charging students and universities to take yet another test at $35 a pop.

Here is what I said to Time Magazine:

“The idea of the CLA+ is to measure learning at various institutions and compare them. I don’t think that’s technically possible with such a diverse system of higher education. That’s based on the fact that all the curriculums are different, textbooks are different, and you’re expecting to get some measure of—in a very generic way across all ­curriculums—how someone learns in one institution compared to another. All institutions are different, and all of their students are different.”

READ MORE OF THIS SWAIL LETTER ON HIGHER EDUCATION

Tags:

3 Responses

  1. Timothy says:

    I always thought college education to be bookish. The moment I entered in real world after my education, the only knowledge I had was read, write and speak. All the books were gone man 🙂

  2. I feel like I went through main stream education, then I entered the real world and my real education began.

    Surely the main benefit of education is to learn the ability or skill of being able to learn as opposed to memorizing a lot of useless facts?

    How do you measure that?

  3. Jennifer says:

    The only way to measure it would be to take a look what happened with person as time passes. You can see level of achievement. That is the only way as far as I can see.

Leave a Reply