Critique Of White House College Summit

A White House push to increase the college-going rates of low-income students flies in the face of real-world trends that are heading in exactly the opposite direction—including institutional and federal financial-aid and tax policy that has been shifting in favor of high-income and not low-income families. Students from the poorest families are less than half as likely as those from the wealthiest to get bachelor’s degrees by the time they’re 25, a statistic cited by the Obama administration as a reason 140 heads of universities, foundations, and advocacy groups were invited to the White House to unveil new ideas they promised would increase the number of low-income students who enroll in college and the rate at which they graduate. These include connecting low-income students with colleges that are the best fit for them and waiving the application fees, providing more scholarships for them in science- and technology-related fields, working with primary and secondary schools to better prepare them for college while improving remedial education that often derails them once they arrive there, and connecting them with adult mentors and advisors. All of these things have been proven in pilot programs to increase the college-going and success rates of students from the nation’s poorest families. The article is in The Hechinger Report.

One comment on “Critique Of White House College Summit”

  1. Better preparing all (including low income-) students so interested for college science and technology education should be a priority in California and other states, and magnet schools like those in the National Consortium of Specialized Secondary Schools for Mathematics, Science and Technology, which we lack in California, play an important role in solving this problem.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *